Letters to the Goldstone Mission: Maurice Ostroff
Memorandum - June 21, 2009
In a letter to Judge Goldstone and the mission, Maurice submitted a Memorandum of evidence. His email was acknowledged by Richard Goldstone. Maurice also provided Goldstone with important resources to understanding Arabic media - by all accounts, this too was ignored.
Maurice's email to friends telling of his work and asking others to submit evidence as well.
July 17, 2009
Attached is a memorandum I sent to Judge Goldstone with a request to pass it on to the members of his mission. See his replies below.
Note in particular The deadline for submissions is 30 June 2009.and the address is factfindinggaza@ohchr.org
Regards
Maurice
From: R.J. Goldstone
To: "maurice@trendline.co.il" <maurice@trendline.co.il>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:56:50 +0200
Subject: RE: Missed opportunities in Gaza
Dear Mr. Ostroff,
Thank you for your e-mail and submission. I have forwarded them to the other three members of the Mission and to our secretariat.
The address for submissions is >factfindinggaza@ohchr.org<
The deadline for submissions is 30 June 2009.
With kind regards,
Richard Goldstone
Having responded to Maurice's submission. Goldstone must have realized that the submission restriction was absurd and tried to quality it by explaining the reason behind this restriction (one imposed by the UN).
We find it interesting that such an important mission (yes, we are joking) would allocate a mere 7 weeks for submission of evidence. In fact, the mission was created only in April 3, 2009 and yet people had only until June 30 to submit evidence.
Having failed to adequately study evidence such as Hamas using Palestinians as human shields, hiding their weaponry within civilian populations, the inflated and inaccurate casualty statistics and much more, Judge Goldstone cited "a short timeline and scarce resources" as justification for only investigating isolated incidents.Again, we are left to assume that they were not very serious about wanting to really collect evidence and given enough time, feared their predetermined results might be in jeopardy if the commission members actually did investigate what occurred in anything close to a thorough manner.
Note the English mistakes and in Maurice's name below were from the original email. We can only assume Judge Goldstone is not a details man.
Follow-up from Judge Goldstone
From: "rjgoldstone
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:05:51 +0200
Subject: The call for submissions
Dear Mr. odstroff, [sic]
It occurs to me that I should [sic] you the terms of the call for submissions that appeared on 8 June 2009 on the website of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. It reads as follows:
UNITED NATIONS FACT FINDING MISSION ON THE GAZA CONFLICT
Fax: (41-22) 928 9003, Telephone: (41 22) 928 9205, E-mail: factfindinggaza@ohchr.org
Call for Submissions
Pursuant to Resolution S-9/1 of the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC), adopted on 12 January 2009 at the conclusion of the 9th Special Session of the Council, the President of the Human Rights Council established, on 3 April 2009, an International Independent Fact Finding Mission mandated “to investigate all violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law that might have been committed at any time in the context of the military operations that were conducted in Gaza during the period from 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009 whether before during or after.
The President of the Council, Ambassador Martin Ihoeghian Uhomoibhi, appointed the following as members of the Fact Finding Mission: Justice Richard J. Goldstone, former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and current Spinoza Fellow at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanity and Social Sciences; Professor Christine Chinkin, Professor of International Law at the London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London; Ms. Hina Jilani, Advocate of the Supreme Court of Pakistan and former Special Representative of the Secretary General on Human Rights Defenders; and Colonel (retired from the Irish Armed Forces) Desmond Travers, member of the Board of Directors of the Institute for International Criminal Investigations (IICI).
The United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict is pleased to invite all interested persons and organizations to submit relevant information and documentation that will assist in the implementation of the Mission's mandate.
Submissions should focus on events and conduct that occurred in the context of the armed conflict that took place between 27 December 2008 and 19 January 2009. The Mission considers that, for the purposes of its mandate, events since June 2008 are particularly relevant to the conflict.
The Mission would be grateful if submissions were presented as concisely as possible.
Due to time constraints the Mission would be grateful to receive submissions in English, but will also accept submissions in Arabic or Hebrew.
Unless otherwise indicated by the author, the Mission will assume that submissions can be made public. Please indicate whether you wish parts or whole submissions to be treated as confidential.
Any information submitted to the Mission in writing should be sent to the Secretariat of the Fact-Finding Mission c/o OHCHR, G. Motta 48, Geneva, or at the email: factfindinggaza@ohchr.org, no later than 30 June 2009.
8 June 2009
Best wishes,
Richard Goldstone
Again, look at the further restriction that the commission members added to the original mandate. According to Goldstone's note: Submissions should focus on events and conduct that occurred in the context of the armed conflict that took place between 27 December 2008 and 19 January 2009. The Mission considers that, for the purposes of its mandate, events since June 2008 are particularly relevant to the conflict.
Goldstone follows this principle when all but ignoring years and years of rocket attacks against Israeli cities and yet ignores it by bringing into his evidence countless incidents related to the West Bank that had nothing to do with Hamas and Gaza.
Memorandum to the UN fact-finding mission
into the recent conflict in Gaza
From: Maurice Ostroff June 21, 2009
email: maurice@trendline.co.il
A missed opportunity to investigate Gilad Shalit’s incarceration and Incitement to genocide
Sadly, none of the reports of your Gaza visit made mention of two very blatant human rights violations that should concern all persons sensitive to Human Rights. I refer to the continuing incarceration of Gilad Shalit and the insidious incitement to genocide that continues on a daily basis in Gaza, as dealt with more fully in Appendices A and B hereto.
International media have reported that Judge Goldstone had expressed admiration for the Palestinians' attitudes toward the probe and that their cooperation would be noted in your report. However, the Palestinian Ma’an news agency was more informative than most other media. On June 2 it reported that while your mandate calls for investigating violations by all parties, including Palestinian fighters and the Hamas-led government, it was unclear if authorities in Gaza would cooperate with that aspect of the inquiry.
On June 9, Ma’an reported that you were experiencing difficulties in collecting information because Hamas-allied security forces accompanied your 15-member team, potentially inhibiting the ability of witnesses to speak freely, a factor that obviously needs to be taken into account in assessing reports by witnesses who stated, for example, that no Hamas fighters or weapons were present in mosques, schools, private houses or hospitals.
Nor did the mission enjoy the complete freedom that had been hoped for to conduct an all-encompassing investigation. In the same issue Ma’an reported that your team refused to release details of its schedule and that reporters and photographers were not permitted to travel with the group.
I sincerely hope that that you will find this memorandum to be useful and that the information contained in it will be reflected in your final report?
Sincerely,
Maurice Ostroff
Appendix A. The Continuing Incarceration of Gilad Shalit
Judge Goldstone has advised that the HRC mandate has been widened from its original narrow wording, to include investigation of all violations that might have been committed at any time in the context of the military operations conducted in Gaza during the period from 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009, whether before, during or after.
Clearly, since the continued holding of Gilad Shalit before, during and after the above period violates both International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, it falls squarely under your mandate.
As the Human Rights Council was created by the UN General Assembly with the main purpose of addressing human rights everywhere, it is very disappointing that your mission missed the opportunity, during your Gaza visit, to address the violations of the rights of Gilad Shalit and his family. It was hoped by many that you would at least try to obtain some tangible evidence of Shalit’s condition and whether or not he is in fact alive.
With the backing of Judge Goldstone’s international prestige and that of the UN in your access to the top Hamas leaders whom you praised for their cooperation, there has never been a better opportunity to obtain even a small encouraging message for Gilad’s parents.
While the “Cast Lead” operation will no doubt require a great deal of forensic investigation before arriving at a conclusion, the injustice of keeping this kidnapped soldier incommunicado for 1,000 days is a blatant, deliberately cruel crime against humanity that cries out for the immediate attention of your mission that was appointed by none other than the UN Human Rights Council.
While there may be some technical quibble about Shalit’s status as a prisoner of war, the Third Geneva Convention provides for humane treatment and the right to unfettered access to the Red Cross, as well as the right to send and receive monthly letters and cards. All of these rights are being denied to Shalit. By its own admission, Hamas controls Shalit’s fate and as such, its leaders are undeniably guilty of this appalling war crime. One cannot help but wonder what inhibited even a mention of the name Gilad Shalit by any member of your Human Rights mission while you conversed amiably with the very persons who are holding him captive.
By way of contrast, Palestinian prisoners in Israel enjoy visitation rights, including conjugal visits, access to telephones, newspapers, television and radio broadcasts, lawyers' visits and even academic studies at state expense.
Denial of POW rights to Shalit is not the only crime. The continued mental torture of Shalit’s family compounds the crime immeasurably. What greater torture can there be than tormenting parents with 24/7 anxiety for three years about whether their son is dead, and if alive in what condition?
Gilad’s family continue to live this horrendous nightmare, not knowing if Gilad is dead or alive and fearing that he is possibly being tortured. To compound the heinous crime, Hamas recently held a public rally during which a boy dressed in IDF uniform masqueraded as Gilad Shalit reading a letter in Hebrew, telling the jeering crowd, how he misses his parents.
No human being with a conscience can refuse to protest this diabolical cruelty.
As mental torture is included in the UN ban on torture, your mission cannot ignore the deliberate torture of Gilad’s family by Hamas. Clearly acts of torture are violations of both International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law. Amnesty International describes every act of torture as a crime under international law.
Article 1 of the UN “Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment” defines torture as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person….” and a study by scientists published on March 6, 2007 in “News in Science” describes mental torture as bad as physical.
It could be that you did raise the subject of Shalit while in Gaza and that the media failed to report it. If that is the case, you are asked to please make a public statement on the matter as soon as possible.
Appendix B. Incitement to genocide
Possibly because of lack of knowledge of Arabic and the fact that Hamas forces accompanied your 15-member team in Gaza, your mission was evidently not exposed to the fundamental prime mover in the Arab Israel conflict. I refer to the prevalent insidious incitement to hate and genocide, propagated on official PA State TV as well as in mosques and schools.
The frequently quoted concept of a cycle of physical violence whereunder one side attacks, the other retaliates and so on is fallacious in that it omits the essential component of the power of words. Hitler’s awful crimes against humanity all started with the kind of abuse of words echoed today in schools, mosques and on State TV in Gaza.
While incitement is regarded by some as the inchoate crime of preparing for another crime, others regard the crime as completed even if the person incited fails to commit the act to which he or she has been incited. Either way, Article 3 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, states clearly that direct and public incitement to commit genocide are punishable acts.
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Incitement to kill Jews starts in the schools. Even new schoolbooks written in 2001 by the PA Education Ministry, include passages from the Koran, teaching that Jews should long for death, from Allah himself.
In these circumstances it would be surprising if the present generation brought up on a diet of hate-the-Jew and the infidel were prepared to live peacefully with a Jewish state as their neighbor. Without doubt, the root cause of the 8,000 rockets fired at Sderot and the subsequent Cast Lead operation lies in this incitement.
The following excerpts from an article by Itamar Marcus, director of Palestinian Media Watch, on the History News Network, are evidence of the blatant unambiguous incitement to genocide readily verifiable by your mission.
A member of the Palestinian Council of Religious Edicts, spelled it out on PA TV: "Jews are Jews. [One] must slaughter them and kill them, as per the word of Allah… Do not have mercy in your hearts for Jews anywhere, in any country. Fight them wherever you are. Anywhere you meet them - kill them. Kill the Jews… Do not have mercy on the Jews. Kill them everywhere."
Just last month a PA religious leader explained the inherently evil nature of the Jew, since the days of Muhammad: " He [Muhammad] battled them and expelled them from Arabia, saying: 'There shall not be two religions in Arabia.' .. Say to the Jews:… 'Expect your graveyard. Expect the final battle.'
The obligation to kill Jews is presented not only as a religious precept, but has been cited repeatedly as a historical necessity.. a senior religious leader, explained: "The battle with the Jews will continue, because the Prophet has decreed it... 'The Day of Resurrection will not come until the Muslims make war against the Jews and kill them, and until the Jew hides behind a rock and tree, and the rock and tree says: 'Oh Muslim, servant of Allah, a Jew is behind me, come and kill him!'…"
Dehumanization
In Judge Goldstone’s recent in-depth interview on Al Jazeera he was asked what brings a country to commit horrific acts like genocide. He replied that dehumanization of the other is the primary factor.
Since dehumanization of infidels, especially Jews, is a regular feature of Palestinian incitement, this fundamental contributor to the Arab Israel conflict in general and to the Cast Lead operation in particular, cannot be ignored if your mission is to arrive at a meaningful conclusion that can contribute towards a peaceful solution.
It is perfectly obvious that the Palestinian Authority leadership as well as Hamas are promoting genocide of the Jewish People, with haunting echoes of Nazi ideology.
Jews are repeatedly dehumanized in words and cartoons as animals - monkeys, pigs, donkeys, rats, worms, scorpions, spiders and octopuses.
A political cartoon in the official Palestinian daily defined the Jew as "the disease of the century."
Because the incitement is in Arabic, I recommend that your mission avail itself of the valuable services provided by two organizations that translate Arabic programs to English. They are
- Middle East Media Research institute (MEMRI) http://www.memri.org/
- Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) http://www.pmw.org.il/